An enquiry asking for "kitchen work" might mean fitting two units or managing a complete refurbishment. Arranging a visit before clarifying that request can leave you assessing a project your business never intended to offer. Qualification starts with understanding the work, not deciding whether you like the customer.
Use this checklist to establish fit before committing time to a site visit and detailed pricing. It covers the requested result, location, information, timing, budget discussion, decision process and your own readiness.
The download has no automatic score or universal minimum budget. Its decision table helps you explain what you know, what remains open and why a particular next step makes sense. Capture the enquiry first, even when these answers are incomplete; the qualification review can follow.
Download the Jobsworth enquiry qualification checklist
One Word file with seven fit questions, a decision table, visit-planning prompts and three contrasting decision examples.
Define the work your business takes on
Before questioning the customer, establish your own business boundaries. Identify the services, project types and areas your team actually supports. An enquiry cannot be assessed against a vague preference for "good jobs" that nobody else in the office understands.
Use practical distinctions. A team specialising in planned installation may need a different assessment process from one offering urgent repairs. A single supplier package and a project requiring coordination of several trades also create different quoting commitments.
Record the request in the customer’s terms, then clarify the desired result. Avoid assigning a solution too early. "Replace kitchen" may need questions about which parts are changing and who is managing the wider work before you can judge fit.
If the request is outside the business offer, explain that plainly. You do not need to invent a visit merely to give every enquiry the same journey. Keep the reason accurate and avoid claiming another provider can perform the work unless you have an appropriate basis.
Check location and access
Confirm the work location rather than using the customer’s correspondence address. A property manager may contact you from an office while the project is elsewhere. The location affects whether the work fits your area and what a useful visit would involve.
Ask about known access arrangements relevant to assessment. Who can meet you, which areas can be seen and what information can be supplied beforehand? You do not need every delivery detail at qualification, but you do need a workable purpose and arrangement for the visit.
The checklist separates known facts from details still to establish. Use that distinction when a postcode is supplied but the full address is awaited. A partial record can support an initial decision without being silently completed from an old Job at a different property.
Identify the information gap
For example, the customer may already have a kitchen supplier and drawings, and want an installation offer only. That is a different request from asking you to design, supply and coordinate the project. Ask which contribution they need before collecting information for the wrong service. If fitting matches your business, identify the supplied specification and the site questions the assessor must review. The same initial phrase can lead to a useful visit once the intended work is defined.
List what is already available: a description, drawing, specification, photographs or relevant measurements. Then name the missing question that affects your ability to assess the request. Asking for "more details" without a purpose can lead to another message that still misses the decision.
For the broad kitchen request, the first question might be whether the customer wants fitting only or supply and coordination too. That answer can determine which information or visit is relevant. It may be more useful initially than collecting dimensions for a scope you have not identified.
Separate information the customer can supply from assessment your team needs to perform. A product selection can be requested remotely; a site condition may need a competent review. The qualification tool helps choose that next contribution rather than replace technical judgement.
If several independent jobs are contained in one message, establish their relationship. A roof repair and kitchen installation at the same address may need different scope conversations. Keep the relevant request clear instead of treating one visit as an assessment of everything.
Discuss timing as a constraint
Ask whether the date is a preference or a fixed requirement, and what depends on it. A customer planning to move back into a property may care about completion rather than a particular start day. Record the actual need before checking availability.
Review whether the business can realistically assess and prepare an offer in the relevant time. A diary gap next week does not establish that selections, supplies and the appropriate team can be ready. Qualification should expose those questions rather than turn them into an early promise.
The download’s timing example uses a preferred November period with an unsettled moving date. A sensible next step is to establish which timing matters and choose a review point. Waiting for a defined input can be a better decision than arranging a visit whose purpose remains unclear.
Use budget and decision questions respectfully
Ask what the customer can share about expectations and choices that affect scope. Explain why the information helps you propose suitable work. An early budget discussion is not an accepted price, and a customer unable to name a figure may still have a well-defined project.
Avoid inventing a market cost to force a quick qualification answer. If you provide an indication, establish its basis and limits through your normal process. The checklist does not supply benchmark prices because your offer depends on the actual work.
Ask how the offer will be reviewed and who needs information. An operational contact may gather proposals for another person. Clarifying that process helps you prepare a useful offer without assuming the caller has authority to approve every commercial decision.
Keep uncertainty accurate. A customer discussing options is not automatically an unsuitable enquiry, and silence does not establish a loss. Use the information to choose a next step, rather than assigning a negative label that the conversation does not support.
Choose a decision from the checklist
The decision table offers four routes: clarify before a visit, arrange a purposeful visit, wait for a defined input or decline an unsuitable request. Record the reason and any action, owner and timing needed to carry that choice forward.
A visit should answer a question the current information cannot resolve. Write that question in the visit prompts, identify who needs to be present and note what remains to obtain afterwards. This gives the person attending a reason to assess particular areas.
If clarification can settle fit remotely, ask the specific question first. If the requested service is outside your offer, give a clear answer. If a prerequisite is genuinely pending, explain what you are waiting for rather than inserting a generic chasing date.
Review one enquiry before arranging a visit
Choose one request and complete the Known and Still to establish fields for each question. Check that your own business readiness is considered alongside the customer’s requirements. A well-described project can still need capacity or competence information before you decide how to proceed.
Then write the decision and the one question or assessment that justifies it. Keep the worksheet with the relevant enquiry context so a colleague can continue from the same understanding. The useful result is a purposeful next contribution, not an automatic score or a visit booked by habit.
Sources and further reading
Give the request and its context a home
Explore Jobsworth enquiry management for recording potential work and choosing how to progress it.
Explore enquiry management